Why I Use Podman Over Docker (Especially for Homelab)
- 1. 1. Daemonless architecture
- 2. 2. Rootless-first model
- 3. 3. CLI compatibility with Docker habits
- 4. 4. Systemd integration is excellent
- 5. 5. Compose support is good enough for real use
- 6. 6. Better fit for NixOS and immutable workflows
- 7. Where Docker still wins
- 8. Quick migration pattern
- 9. Bottom line
Docker is still excellent, but for my workflow Podman is the better default. I use it for both local development and home infrastructure.
1. Daemonless architecture
Docker relies on a central daemon. Podman does not.
Why that matters:
- Fewer moving parts
- Better process model (containers are normal child processes)
- Easier troubleshooting with standard Linux tools
2. Rootless-first model
Podman makes rootless containers a normal path, not an afterthought.
Benefits:
- Smaller blast radius if a container is compromised
- Better multi-user isolation
- Cleaner security posture for personal servers
3. CLI compatibility with Docker habits
Most day-to-day commands map directly:
1 | podman pull nginx |
If needed, aliasing docker=podman works for many workflows.
4. Systemd integration is excellent
For homelab services, systemd integration is a major win.
You can generate and manage service units cleanly, then use standard host tooling for restart policies, dependencies, and startup ordering.
5. Compose support is good enough for real use
With podman compose, most common Compose files run fine. For advanced edge cases, small syntax tweaks are sometimes needed, but for Pi-hole, reverse proxies, monitoring, and app stacks it is usually smooth.
6. Better fit for NixOS and immutable workflows
In NixOS-centric setups, daemonless tools and declarative service definitions align well. Podman feels natural in that model, especially when combining:
- Declarative host config in Nix
- Container workload separation
- Reproducible rebuild mindset
Where Docker still wins
I still pick Docker when:
- A team depends on Docker Desktop specific integrations
- Vendor docs/scripts assume Docker-only behavior
- A CI environment is already standardized around Docker daemon features
Use the tool that matches constraints, not ideology.
Quick migration pattern
- Install Podman.
- Start by running existing containers with
podman run. - Move compose projects with
podman compose up -d. - Validate volumes, network names, and health checks.
- Convert long-running services to systemd-managed units.
Bottom line
Podman gives me safer defaults, less daemon complexity, and better Linux-native operations. For solo projects and homelab services, that tradeoff is usually worth it.
Title: Why I Use Podman Over Docker (Especially for Homelab)
Author: Nemanja Djurcic
Date: 07-02-2026
Last Update: 07-02-2026
Blog Link: https://blog.nemanjadjurcic.com/2026/02/07/why-podman-over-docker-for-homelab-and-dev/
Copyright Declaration: The author owns the copyright, please indicate the source reproduced.
Share